Talk:Arabic typography

Typography High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Arab world Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Examples given in the 1st table display identically.

The example text provided in the first table intends to differentiate Arial from Tahoma. However the examples listed under each type display identically. 98.47.170.188 (talk) 09:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to rename this article

As I read it, this article is about type design for Arabic script. It is not about typography, which about designing pages as whole. Typography includes layout, typeface selection, margins, illustrations and so on. So I propose to move the article to "Arabic type design". Does anyone have a reason why I should not go ahead? (I will leave this notice until 30 March.) 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:22, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a similar proposal at talk:Thai typography and have been advised to widen it to talk:East Asian typography. Consequently, I will delay taking any action until 15 April, to give time for further comments. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 08:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]