Talk:Aquileia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aquileia article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

World Heritage Sites

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of World Heritage Sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(^{Dime algo}_{or see my works}) 19:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ecclesiastical history

I am sure that the ecclesiastical history is important and interesting, and should probably be merged with the rest of the history. But what we have here begins

The former city of the Roman Empire, situated at the head of the Adriatic, on what is now the Austrian sea-coast…

The Austrian fucking sea-coast? Who is writing this—Jörg Haider? Is there another encyclopedia which could get away with such crap? No. Someone has just found an out of copyright, and easy to cut and paste, source of ‘facts’, and has decided to drop it here without even reading the first sentence. Would it not have been better to have dropped it somewhere else? When we don’t have an article on something of interest, but someone else a long time ago did, why don’t we just put in a link to it? Hint: updating merely that sentence will not make the article better. On the contrary, it will make it worse. But of course if you have a good reason why this is likely to work better as an inclusion rather that as a link then state if here. ±Ian Spackman 18:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I have moved it to Aquileia/Ecclesiastical history (a work in progress) where I hope that people will indeed bring it up to scratch. ±Ian Spackman 18:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png

Image:Friuli-Venezia Giulia-Stemma.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology?

So, I am wondering what the source for this article's assertion that Aquileia is "apparently named from an indigenous world Akylis"? I also think that "world" should probably be "word", though I didn't think it was worth editing unless some authority for the basic assertion could be found.

I believe that both Italic and Celtic dialects have been suggested as sources for the name -- either would be reasonable, given the location. However, it is also possible that we have a name from some unknown Indo-European dialect that was neither Celtic nor Italic. For example, that -eia suffix presumably comes from a PIE *-eya:/-eyo- suffix and does not particularly point to an origin in any particular branch of IE. Moreover, similar -eia place-name suffixes show up in other Eastern Alpine names that are pretty clearly not Celtic, and probably not Italic. Although the Aquil- element is also difficult to interpret (I believe Pokorny related it to PIE *akwa:- "water", but that should probably not be taken as gospel), I would bet that though the name is probably "indigenous", it is probably indigenously IE (not surprisingly), if not necessarily from a known branch such as Celtic or Italic. Of course, that's largely speculation on my part and shouldn't be included in any Wikipedia entry (even if policy weren't against original research)! I believe that there are several articles dealing with Eastern Alpine names by Peter Anreiter, though I don't have access to them and don't know if they touch on the name of Aquileia specifically.

However, in any case, I am still wondering about the source for the "Akylis" currently mentioned in the article?

Carlsefni (talk) 16:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is up with all the stuff about how wonderful glassblowers are and industrous people from the Alexandria? This is out of place in this article. It ought to be obvious to anyone what is wrong with this gushing-on about the wonders of imagined ancestors. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.120.202 (talk) 03:27, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Grado was founded before Venice and in fact is often referred to as "the mother of Venice." Though this is incorrect, the town was a Roman castrum (as your site rightly points out) and so was founded long before Alaric or Attila besieged Aquileia.

Michael Seaman — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.9.236.182 (talk) 14:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The woodcut in the article from the Nuremberg Chronicle is not Aquileia

The city pictured is 'Maynz' (Modern: Mainz); I own an incunable of this page, and it is captioned. See page 39 of the Nuremberg Chronicle, Hartmann Schedel, 1493^[1].

An electronic copy of the Nuremberg Chronicle can be found here. Scroll to image 115 of 614, which is a scan of page 39.

RJKMatthews (talk) 06:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC) RJKMatthews, 24 June 2016, 2:08AM EDT.[reply]

References

^ 'Die Schedelsche Weltchronik' ('Liber Chronicarum,' 'The Nuremberg Chronicle'), Hartmann Schedel, 1493, Anton Koberger, pg.39

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aquileia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722055308/http://www.terrediaquileia.it/docebo/doceboCms/index.php?special=changearea&newArea=572 to http://www.terrediaquileia.it/docebo/doceboCms/index.php?special=changearea&newArea=572

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] 'Die Schedelsche Weltchronik' ('Liber Chronicarum,' 'The Nuremberg Chronicle'), Hartmann Schedel, 1493, Anton Koberger, pg.39

[1]