Jump to content

Talk:April Winchell

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regretsy

[edit]

the portion regarging regretsy could be more accurate. The main focus is a little unclear- and biased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.253.20 (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


this page is full of fluff

[edit]

It reads as though it were created by Winchell herself. Uucp 18:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

can you be more specific? such comments aren't very constructive. 63.100.44.98 17:29, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I agree - most of the "information" is definitely of the fluff variety and very much ego-tistic. I'm not even clear about how this entry got through in the first place (??) Her achievements are non-achievements. BlakeWilliams (talk)
Yo, this page is bogus, ya know? It's total self-aggrandizing bulltaco. Somebody better clean this mess up, yo what I'm saying? 2602:306:CCEE:CD90:6A1C:A2FF:FE02:4C44 (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

she was in Kim Possible as Ms Hatchet the librarian 203.129.40.168 07:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like this article doesn't cover much of what's even in her public bios, so I doubt it was written entirely by her. She seems pretty prolific for a voice actress, even though I only know her from Regretsy. 98.225.230.65 (talk) 06:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cancer

[edit]

Which organ? F W Nietzsche (talk) 19:05, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The Exorcist

[edit]

The sentence "She was also considered for the part of the Exorcist" is clearly nonsense, so I've changed it - although the thought of a 13-year-old girl playing a middle-aged male priest is quite amusing Dom Kaos (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American Dragon Jake Long role

[edit]

Didn't she play Rose's mom in ADJL? Because she is credited in the credits of "Dreamscape." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.66.198.195 (talk) 00:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paypal

[edit]

the portion about paypal isn't accurate iether, it contains misinformation and incomplete facts.

New discussion sections should go at the bottom of discussion pages, not at the top. You should also sign your posts.
I added to the sentence regarding PayPal showing that there was a resolution to the event. --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article doesn't flow like other living persons

[edit]

Forgive me for not having the right words to properly describe what seems off about this article. It reads like a resume, or something. It has facts, but allot of fluff and seems to be written to flatter the subject and not objective. I don't know- I don't have anything against her but this article seems like it was written FOR her, or BY her and not ABOUT her. 74.195.243.97 (talk) 17:12, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]