Talk:Appropriation of knowledge

Philosophy: Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On June 2016, it was proposed that this article be moved from Appropriation (education) to Appropriation of knowledge. The result of the discussion was moved.

Proposed merge with Appropriation (sociology)

Both articles refer to "appropriation of knowledge", though one author may be more from a "history of knowledge" background while the others have a stronger educational theory background. Nevertheless, these are not completely different meanings of "appropriation". The more art-related aspects are best covered by Appropriation (art). Also see how the corresponding article in the German Wikipedia covers a completely different aspect of appropriation, which we refer to as Original appropriation here. PanchoS (talk) 15:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge; I agree that the article express similar, although not identical, meaning of the term appropriation, both in the field of sociology. The differences in meaning are worth exploring on a common page, so I support the merge. Klbrain (talk) 13:14, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: I've changed my view. The two pages are looking at distinct forms of appopriation. One in the context of education and training, one is the context of sociology, but so obtusely written that the analogy and metaphor is hard to extract from the intended meaning. The set of sources (without inline citations) is more revealing of the intended scope of the page. Klbrain (talk) 13:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 June 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: MOVED (non-admin closure) Rebb ing 19:42, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriation (education) → Appropriation of knowledge – Apart from education, Appropriation of knowledge is closely related to history of knowledge, sociology of knowledge and developmental psychology. It is even a subject of legal studies. The disambiguator therefore does more harm than it helps. Instead I'm proposing Appropriation of knowledge per WP:NATURALDIS, which is specific in regard to the subject of studies rather than one or the other academic field studying the subject. -- PanchoS (talk) 15:48, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.