Talk:Apple Bank Building

Apple Bank Building has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 16, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Apple Bank Building appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 April 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that New York Times writer David W. Dunlap said calling the Apple Bank Building a neighborhood bank branch "is like calling Grand Central Terminal a commuter train station"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Apple Bank Building.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Apple Bank Building

... that New York Times writer David W. Dunlap said calling the Apple Bank Building a neighborhood bank branch "is like calling Grand Central Terminal a commuter train station"? Source: Dunlap, David W. (January 9, 1994). "Postings: Commission Expands, Carnegie Hall Historic Zone; Landmark Lobby, Larger District". The New York Times.
- ALT1: ... that a New York Times writer said that calling the Apple Bank Building a neighborhood bank branch "is like calling Grand Central Terminal a commuter train station"? Source: Dunlap, David W. (January 9, 1994). "Postings: Commission Expands, Carnegie Hall Historic Zone; Landmark Lobby, Larger District". The New York Times.
- ALT2: ... that unlike other large banking halls in New York City, which became event venues or lobbies, the Apple Bank Building is still used as a bank? Source: Gray, Christopher (June 10, 2010). "When Banks Looked Like a Million Bucks". The New York Times
- ALT3: ... that the residential apartments at the Apple Bank Building were marketed by a real-estate firm that had been forced to leave the building? Source: Bahney, Anna (February 13, 2005). "To Let Buyers Window-Shop, Brokers Shop for Windows". The New York Times; Hughes, C. J. (December 17, 2006). "Homes Above the Tellers' Windows". The New York Times.
- ALT4: ... that the Apple Bank for Savings once did not put bulletproof partitions for tellers at the Apple Bank Building because it would require removing ornamental ironwork? Source: Dunlap, David W. (November 11, 1990). "Commercial Property: Banking Chambers; Finding Tenants to Fill the Temple-of-Finance Voids". The New York Times.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cy Block

Created by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 12:40, 22 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Excellent article, long enough, new enough, well cited, DYK check all green. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maury Markowitz (talk • contribs) 15:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P4 without image

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Apple Bank Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Shushugah (talk · contribs) 22:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is exceptionally well written. I found a few mistakes though. See below for further comments
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
19% similarity found on earwig, but manually verified not an issue
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Yes freely licensed with CC 4.0 SA or public domain
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

MDCCLIX should be MDCCCLIX (missing a 'C')
The caption in Wikipedia are all excellent, but one photo showing a residential view with incorrect description on Commons: it should state 2112 Broadway as visually depicted, even if the main building entrance is 2100 Broady
Wikilink Anti-German sentiment
In one case an online sources exist, it would be nice to link to them. ie A little bit lauder. It still can be linked, even though WP:NYPOST discourages its usage. In this case, I think it's warranted/acceptable to keep. All in all, an excellent article with some minor changes to implement. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shushugah, thanks for the review and sorry it took so long for me to reply. I did not see the comments until now. I'll work on these shortly. – Epicgenius (talk) 16:59, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Shushugah, it looks like these changes were implemented. (Courtesy ping due to the length of the review) Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie thank you for pinging me. I have a reputation as not being reliably responsive on GA reviews, but in this case I wasn't pinged about implemented changes till now. Thank you for that, and of course, if I was pinged/don't respond after a reasonable period, I always encourage others to boldly take-over/ping again. My tardiness shouldn't hinder anyone else. More pertinently, congrats on another GA! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius forgot to ping! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 21:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]