Talk:Anushka Sharma/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 06:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 06:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Comments

• Despite having an article on Wikipedia, I heard that Taran Adarsh is paid for writing his reviews. Why not include Raja Sen, Rajeev Masand or Anupama Chopra in his place.

Replaced it with Khalid Mohamed. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• "alongside Shah Rukh Khan and Katrina Kaif, which marked her fifth collaboration with Yash Raj Films." — "alongside Shah Rukh Khan and Katrina Kaif, which marked her fifth collaboration with Yash Raj Films and her second with Khan."

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Sources

• Wikilink Verve

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Write all the references that have the names of their authors in order of "last name, first name".

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 6:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

• Rediff — Rediff.com.

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Business of Cinema — Business of Cinema.

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Bollywood Life — Bollywood Life.

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Times of India — The Times of India.

Done. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 2:17, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• There are a few redirects. Fix them.

@Yashthepunisher: What about this one? The green ones are the ones that need fixing. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 14:44, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you help? I can't figure out in many instances what to do. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: I have archived some of those green one's url...still it says redirect preserve and change sub-domain. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: I have fixed the redirects for you. Get the article copyedited. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:33, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Scribbleink has performed a c.e as per your suggestion. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Note

Several major alterations are being made to the article after the review by a certain new editor. It definitely fails the "stability" criteria to become a GA. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@Krimuk90: The new editor has indeed made a lot of edits in between. The article can be given a good copyedit before it can be passed. Till then I'll put it on hold. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Ssven. I'll give the article a good copy-edit later this week. I hope Yash doesn't mind adding me as a co-nominator in the review. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:23, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

@Krimuk90: I have told the user to hold her edit for a while, It won't happen again. It will be great If you can give it a copy edit and help in fixing the redirect issues. But I don't want to see this article failing in its first Nomination. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:56, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Since the user has performed an act of sockpuppetery and has not made another editor perform a copyedit, I'll have to fail this article. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 04:36, 8 July 2015 (UTC)