Talk:Antonia Bolingbroke-Kent

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Eligibility issues

@Roxedl:, breaking down the neccessary issues that would need to be fixed to make this passable for DYK (I thought it would be better here than in the nomination):

The article is just long enough by readable prose, 1522 characters and 1500 is the minimum so that's ok.
As a WP:BLP really everything needs to be cited to reliable sources to pass policy. At the moment sentences such as "Antonia Bolingbroke-Kent graduated from the University of Edinburgh in Modern History, before she began to work for the broadcaster ITV.", "She is a fellow of the Royal Geographical Society.", "She is the grandchild of Walter Couchman." and half the second paragraph have no citations. And that includes the hook fact.
You're perfectly welcome to suggest other hooks for consideration by the way, I think there are other possibilities.
The BBC article is a deadlink it seems, but its a good start. I think the article still leans too heavily on the subject's blog, books and interviews. More third party sources would help to strengthen the article.
The total travelled is given as either 12.561 miles or 12.783 miles, where does the discrepancy come from? If its a world record an exact figure should be available?

Let me know what you think. Spokoyni (talk) 00:06, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]