Talk:Anton Meyer

Anton Meyer has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 20, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Holby Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Holby task force (assessed as High-importance).

Soap Operas

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Anton Meyer/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments:

As SHO is used later, it should be in parenthesis on the first mention of Senior house officer.
Hyphens have been used instead of dashes, see WP:DASH.
Overlinking - only wikify once, on the first mention (the lead being an exception).
Spelling - particulary.

Summary: There are just some minor issues as outlined above. I will allow up to seven days for these to be rectified, before making any further decision.

Thank you very much for your review. I've fixed all the issues highlighted above, with one question - does overlinking apply to the references as well as links in the body of the article? The MOS on linking doesn't seem to address it - I'd assume it's similar to the long table clause, and each reference should be able to stand on its own, but if that's not the case I will of course be happy to change that too. Frickative 21:30, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final comments: Thank you for all your work in making this a better article. To answer your question, there are no rules that I am aware of for links in the references. As that section is used in such a way where the reader may be hopping to different parts of the section, I think it is not a bad idea to have them repeated. Since all issues have been resolved, I am now confident that the article meets all the requirements of a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Anton Meyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080517135657/http://www.newstatesman.com/199901290035 to http://www.newstatesman.com/199901290035

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]