Talk:Antoine, Duke of Lorraine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antoine, Duke of Lorraine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Antoine, Duke of Lorraine has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 23, 2020	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 4, 2020, June 4, 2021, and June 4, 2024.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / European / French / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

According to my notes (for which I can't locate the source), Antoine had two additional kids: Charles, who was Bishop of Metz 1550-51, and Louis, who was a Cardinal 1553-78. Anybody know about these guys? --Michael K. Smith (talk) 03:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Antoine, Duke of Lorraine/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will post my comments soon. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 18:30, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No duplink, dablink, copyvio issues. No external links
Sourcing looks decent, citations neatly formatted. But all bullets in Family don't have inline citations. I have removed those particular children, as I was not able to verify them.

Comments on prose

Fairly well-written and covers the topic well. Pleasant read :) A few comments: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does 14/15 September 1515 mean the battle date is not confirmed or was it supposed to be an endash? Have changed to proper date with endash.
Why is the last para of Duchy legal status in present tense unlike the rest of the article? fixed
There should ideally be a different section on Death and possibly Legacy. Expanded. I was not sure how far down the "rabbit hole" to go. Thoughts?
Link terms such as 'gout' at first mention. fixed

All the changes look good. I changed Legacy to Aftermath in the section heading as it's more of the events that followed his death and not like what significant influence he has had in recent times. Should be okay to promote now, cheers Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:04, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]