Talk:Anti-thymocyte globulin

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Anti-thymocyte globulin.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Untitled

There's horse ATG and rabbit ATG. What's the clinical or pharmacokinetic difference, if any? Should this be mentioned in the entry? (I'm not knowledgable enough to do it.) --Spiff666 (talk) 19:00, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are significant differences in the action and composition of horse and rabbit ATG. I know a little bit about this, and I will work to find out more in order to expand this article. (If I can figure out all the ins and outs of doing so; I see by reading the editing tutorial that contributing to Wikipedia can be a little complicated.) As far as ATG goes, there are also such preparations made from animals other than rabbits and horses, and directed against animals other than humans. These would be for researching ATG action, which is somewhat mysterious, as in immunizing rabbits with rat thymus extracts, then collecting and purifying the ATG from the rabbit blood for injection into rats.Trigley (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've added some text, but the citations will have to wait 'til I figure out to insert them correctly. I've tried to correct misstatements (some of them); I hope I don't step on anybody's toes. There is much more that could be said about this subject, but I'm not sure how much is appropriate, since there is such a large medical literature on the subject already (tens of thousands of articles in peer-reviewed journals). Comments, suggestions?Trigley (talk) 01:45, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Focus on recent articles. Query pubmed with "antithymocyte globulin" "review" and see what appears. If possible, find a Cochrane review. LeadSongDog come howl! 21:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-thymocyte globulin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101213104320/http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN29899028/ to http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN29899028/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:24, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]