Talk:Anti-submarine weapon

Military history: Technology / Weaponry C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Hedgehog

Is it correct to call "Hedgehog" as a depth charge mortar? I was under the impression that the hedgehog munitions were contact weapons and were not triggered by hydrostatic changes.KTo288 18:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First hit by hedgehog

In another of Clay Blair's books, Hitler's U-Boat War, the author mentions that although the HMS Westcott was equiped with hedgehogs, it did not have the opportunity to employ the weapon against the U-581. If this is true, the first sinking would have to go to another encounter. Jayman435 (talk) 00:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-submarine warfare vs. Category:Anti-submarine weapons

Category:Anti-submarine weapons is itself a category within Category:Anti-submarine warfare. — Robert Greer (talk) 21:21, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anti-submarine weapon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080106072912/http://www.weymouthdiving.co.uk:80/torpedoes.htm to http://www.weymouthdiving.co.uk/torpedoes.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustic torpedo

The torpedo section here claims that "The first successful homing torpedo was introduced by Nazi Germany's Kriegsmarine", and that the United States introduced its Mark 24 mine (FIDO) "After capturing several of these weapons".
I don’t know where the latter idea comes from, as there are no references in this section at all, but according to the article on the German T4 Falke (the first, and not particularly successful German version of an acoustic torpedo) it was first used in action in March 1943; while the American FIDO started development in 1941, and was first used just two months after the Falke. So It's unlikely that Falke had any bearing on the design of FIDO; and as the former were only used on three occasions, it's unlikely any examples of Falke were captured before FIDO became operational. Can anyone shed any light on this? Xyl 54 (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]