Talk:Anti-materiel rifle

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Material (spelling)

It looks to me as if the more common spelling here is the anglicised "anti-material" rather than "anti-materiel" (seemingly supported by a quick google search). I have moved the page and changed some linked articles. Any objections to this? I'm no military specialist but the spelling looked unusual. Greg 14:13, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It should be anti-materiel, the "e" takes an accent (grave?). Never trust google for spelling (confomrity of ignorant masses), use dictionaries. GraemeLeggett 15:24, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Materiel is the technically correct spelling. Straight from my Webster's New World Dictionary:

Materiel n. 1. Materials and tools necessary to any work, enterprise, etc.; specif., weapons, equipment supplies, etc. of armed forces: distinguished from personnel 2. Weapons and equipment of armed forces in combat

Material n. 1. What a thing is, or may be, made of; elements, parts, or constituents. [raw material] 2. Ideas, notes, sketches, etc., that may be worked up or elaborated; data 3. cloth or other fabric 4. Implements, articles, etc. needed to make or do something [writing materials] --D.E. Watters 15:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you're right -- "materiel" itself seems to be an anglicisation of "matériel" but if the former is more common we should stick with that.Greg 15:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History section

Why isn't there one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.221.35 (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aimo Lahti

https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahti_L-39 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.249.202.148 (talk) 01:21, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

civilian

Anzio_20mm_rifle has an aericle — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.7.100 (talk) 02:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Boys as an improvement to the Lee Enfield.

There's now some edit-warring going on, as to whether the Boys was developed to replace the British .303 or the US .30-06 rounds. However both of these are nonsense - there is no development history from the SMLE to the Boys. If anything, the Boys is a British reaction to continental Europe and the use of 12–15mm rifles specifically as anti-tankette rounds. Its origins are with the T-Gewehr and the Lahti, not the SMLE. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]