Talk:Anti-Hero (song)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. Cherrell410^{(t · c)} 14:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 16:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cherrell410: Hi! This is just a reminder in case you forgot! Thanks. ℛonherry☘ 07:46, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my holiday has gone over by a few days. I will probably get to this later today or tomorrow. Cherrell410^{(t · c)} 18:20, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronherry: I have reviewed this and placed it on hold until all of the content that i have listed below is fixed. Cherrell410^{(t · c)} 01:35, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

comes back to around 43%, but the wp article is quoting that website correctly
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:

This is extremely stable for something that gets as much media attention as this does
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

Could you add a picture of swift performing live in the background section?

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

Suggestions for improvement below:

Background: "Swift rolls a lottery cage" should have something before it showing that this is what happened in this series
Ref 20 is tagged as a permanetaly dead link, although it isn't
Music video: critics. However, ... --> critics, however, ...
Performances and usage: first bullet: this should either have a transition between the two sentences as they aren't directly related, or a new bullet point for the latter.
The article mentions a remix done by bleachers (which antonoff is a part of), but I noticed that additional remixes have been done by illenium, roosevelt, jayda g and kungs.
See also: spotify list doesn't link anywhere
Refs 81, 96 and 155 are twitter, youtube and facebook, respectively, which shouldn't be used.

@Cherrell410:

Done all, except the "facebook" reference since the official Malaysian recording industry organization uses only Facebook to publish its charts. All songs that has ever charted in Malaysia and has an article on Wikipedia—they all use the Facebook link as the source in the Charts section. ℛonherry☘ 06:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.