Talk:Anthracene

Offensive External link

The "mbox-small plainlinks sistersitebox" on this page contains a 7000x7000px invisible image with a link through shortening service gee.su to an offensive FB page. I inspected the HTML. I don't know enough of WP infrastructure to know what is going on, but this is definitely weird and wrong. I don't see an edit on this page that would have caused this, but the same change doesn't seem to have propagated to every WP page with a sistersitebox, which is roughly all WP pages. So... raising my hand or pointing my finger or something.

IUPAC name

The c is not correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.221.89.14 (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Anthracene" is given as the IUPAC name at the PubChem link in the infobox. What would you suggest as the IUAPC name instead? -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram needed

The discussion of 9,10-dehydroanthracene and 1,4-dehydroanthracene as possible reduction products would be clearer with a diagram showing the numbering of the carbons. Dirac66 (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Toxicology reference

The reference for "Unlike many other polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), anthracene is not classified as carcinogenic as listed by the U.S. agency OSHA" leads to a sigma aldrich page that doesn't have any data on it. All the other sources I have found say that it is a carcinogen, such as an actual sigma aldrich page (http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/help-welcome/hazard-and-precautionary-statements.html#pictogram). As such I will be removing the statementDeadlyops (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching that glitch. I will go back and repair that section. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:27, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anthracene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anthracene. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote required?

It occurred to me that people may confuse it with Anthropocene, and my suspicions would seem to be confirmed by the existence of Anthrocene as a redirect. 88.145.189.130 (talk) 20:11, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interest in a short historical section ala 1,2-dichloroethane

The compound was discovered by Auguste Laurent in 1835. I think the articles on his derivatives ought to make mention of him and the significance of the compound. This compound was very important in the development of the atomic theory in the 1800s. There is precedent for the inclusion of at minimum a pithy historical discussion in articles of this nature - see the article on 1,2-dichloroethane. The crystalline nature of the stuff was interestingly also very important as well. See DeMilt, Clara, "Auguste Laurent, Founder of Modern Chemistry." Chymia, Vol. 4 (1953), p. 85-114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27757164. These compounds are also discussed in the later memoires of Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Gerhardt, and Pasteur. 24.170.207.220 (talk) 06:46, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add to article

Basic information to add to this article (in order to help make it more properly encyclopedic): the etymology of the term "anthracene." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:09, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Benz(a)anthracene

Should this article include a mention of Benz(a)anthracene? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 05:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]