Talk:Another Link in the Chain Tour

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 26 December 2023 by reviewer Crunchydillpickle (talk · contribs).

Alternative music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the notability tag

@Ilikedietcola and Crunchydillpickle: I'm not seeing evidence that the subject meets the concert tour notability guideline. Only The Daily Telegraph looks reliable, the other two citations are either primary or self-published sources, and so don't count towards an assessment of notability. Let me know what you think. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:50, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a few references readily available to indicate notability, two of which are from Rolling Stone. Over the next few days, I intend on touching up this article with some additional content and sources. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 13:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dobbyelf62: I'd appreciate if you did that! Could you provide links to the sources you're talking about? I'd like to take a quick look at them. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 15:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I'll start incorporating a few of them into the article now. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 18:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, @TechnoSquirrel69, I remember being on the fence about accepting and I'm fairly new to AfC reviews so I trust your judgement more than my own. If Dobbyelf62 isn't able to find more more sources, I'm down to delete it. Sorry about that! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 22:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good news: I was successful in finding more sources, so let me know if this is sufficient. If not, I might be able to dredge up a few more sources to further improve the article. Dobbyelf62 (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize, Crunchydillpickle — we're all learning here! I think it's great that you're willing to accept some drafts that are in a borderline area; as you can see, it helps get more eyes on the article, which hopefully results in a more polished product through collaboration. Dobbyelf62, thanks a lot for your work so far! The sources you've added are definitely an improvement. I just want to note for information that interviews, as primary sources, can't be considered when demonstrating the subject's notability. However, between the Daily Telegraph article and the Definitive History book, I think that's just enough to pass the general notability guideline in this case. I'm going to go ahead and remove the {{Notability}} tag and mark the article as reviewed. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for all your work on this - really appreciate your expertise and it's great to see the page expand. Ilikedietcola (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]