Talk:Anne E. Lazarus/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: DocZach (talk · contribs)
Reviewer: Mokadoshi (talk · contribs) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately, after comparing this article to the six good article criteria I have to quick-fail this nomination for the following reasons:
Failed good article nomination on March 24, 2024
[edit]Upon its review on March 24, 2024, this good article nomination was quick-failed because:
- it had a virtual or complete lack of reliable sources,
thus making it ineligible for good article consideration. According to Wikipedia:Verifiability, "Material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source." The article relies significantly on primary or non-independent sources, which are not WP:RELIABLE for the good article criteria. Other sources, like Ballotpedia, have no consensus as to their reliability; having these in an article is fine, but an article has to also have reliable sources to become GA. Additionally, it wouldn't be possible to review this article as it is currently subject to a content dispute: it is currently nominated for deletion and consensus has not been reached yet as to the notability of the subject.
This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. Mokadoshi (talk) 02:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)