This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
In the section that alleges that Kuster dodged a question about Libya during a Q&A about the Middle East, I am removing the claim that U.S. policy has considered Libya part of the Middle East consistently since 1957. That claim is not supported by the citation. Because there are multiple detailed reasons why this claim is unsupported and because there might opposition to this edit, I wanted to give a detailed explanation in the Talk page. I should note that the link only leads to first page of the article. The rest of the article at JSTOR is behind a pay wall. However, the whole article can be found at the website for the source, Foreign Affairs magazine, here: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/71575/roderic-h-davison/where-is-the-middle-east . First, the whole point of this article titled "Where is the Middle East?" is that the Middle East has been defined inconsistently, even within the U.S. government. The claim that Libya has been part of some sort of controlling official government definition of the U.S. government is based on the fact that Secretary of State Dulles included Libya when asked what "Middle East" meant in 1957. But in step with article's POV that the definition is hard to nail, it immediately after notes that State Department officials in 1958 excluded Libya from their definition of the Middle East. The article goes on to mention several other definitions of the Middle East, many of which exclude Libya. Second, I don't think it's accurate to label an officials description of an area to be a policy. Third, the cited article was published in 1960. Obviously, it's silent as to how U.S. officials have defined the term Middle East from 1961 to present. --JamesAM (talk) 23:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Early Life and Education section is confusing. It discusses events in the 1980s before her education, in the 70s, and it is not clear when it is discussing the subject's mother and when it is discussing the subject. With both in play, "she" becomes ambiguous.
Ccrrccrr (talk) 17:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Ann McLane Kuster → Annie Kuster – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCP, most sources, and indeed her own campaign materials refer to her as "Annie Kuster", not "Ann McLane Kuster". Her House website does list her name as "Ann McLane Kuster", and some sources use "Ann Kuster", but it seems that most use the more familiar "Annie Kuster" is the most widely used in reliable secondary sources. WMSR (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
