Talk:Anime Punch!

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 8 June 2008, see discussion.
Speedy delete, 3 January 2006, see discussion.
Speedy delete, 3 January 2006, see discussion.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Anime and manga: Conventions Low‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Conventions work group.

Move

Support... MediaWiki supports it and it is the proper title. gren グレン 12:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Nightst a llion (?) 10:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fieldcon's Removal

I have removed fieldcon because it doesn't seem to be important to anyone. I mean, the attendance was only about 50 people, and it's just a little outdoor get together. If this qualifies, then why doesn't the dance *prod*. Now, if for some reason fieldcon was important, perhaps it could be included. For example if Anime News Network writes an article say "Anime Punch! is expanding the field of anime conventions to... well... a field...", you get the idea. As of now, though, I'm not convinced of it's worth mentioning. Feel free to convince me, I'm usually easily swayed. Kopf1988 (talk) 23:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Importance has little to do with attendance, but this is the first anime convention that is completely outdoors, which makes it pretty significant and worth mentioning in AP's article since they also run that convention. --Farix (Talk) 14:54, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can agree. But that brings up another question: are we sure it's the first anime convention that's completely outdoors? Kopf1988 (talk) 00:41, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anime Punch!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]