Talk:Anglo-Mysore wars

Untitled

Technically the British were represented in India by the British East-India company till 1857, and only then did the crown take over.

Hence the chagne

Prashnathns Prashanthns 09:00, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Request to rename this page to 'List of Anglo-Mysore Wars'

I seem to have incorrectly created a new page with the requested title. Since each war is documented seperately, it makes sense to rename this page instead. As well, this allows linking to the Template:Anglo-Mysore Wars page from each individual war.

SpikedZebra 09:30, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglo-Mysore Wars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120303205010/http://www.nal.res.in/pdf/pdfrocket.pdf to http://www.nal.res.in/pdf/pdfrocket.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Anglo-Mysore War 4.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 29 November 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per discussion below. Best, (closed by non-admin page mover) Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 07:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

---

Anglo-Mysore Wars → Anglo-Mysore wars – Sources use lowercase wars about half the time, so per MOS:CAPS we should use lowercase wars, too. Dicklyon (talk) 05:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose: Per MOS:MILITARY, War(s) is capitalized if it is so in sources. A quick look through sources says that Wars is capitalized in this case. Another similar example to look at is Anglo-Maratha Wars, where every article has it capitalized as well. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:00, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  The criterion in MOS:CAPS is "consistently capitalized in independent reliable sources". Book stats show nearly half lowercase, so nowhere close to consistently capitalized. A web search will show something very different, due to web style and Wikipedia influence. Also the singular will be much more often capitalized; the plural term that describes the group is not a proper name. Dicklyon (talk) 19:18, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Dicklyon The same Book stats show that capital is more common. Using general search (understand that it might be influenced, but at the end is a common name) shows no place that uses a lowercase. Also, the sources mentioned in the current article, atleast titles of them, include a capital Wars. Again emphasizing my point of similar wars also using a capital letter, even for plural terms. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 02:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  The criterion is not "more common", but "consistently capitalized". Dicklyon (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  Neither is consistently capitalized though; sources seem to be using both. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 03:23, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  Exactly. Dicklyon (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  Book titles are in title case. We use sentence case for article titles.Dicklyon (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

  WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS kinds of arguments are not good reasons to not fix something. Dicklyon (talk) 02:55, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

• Support, will go with Dicklyon on this one. The four individual wars are properly uppercased (see this example) but in this title 'wars' is an inclusive summary of the four wars that sources are split 50-50 on, falling too low of the requirement on Wikipedia. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:57, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
• Support—must be consistently capped. Tony (talk) 04:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.