Jump to content

Talk:Angie Goff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 27 2014 edits

[edit]

I have edited and added information. To the intro I added that she is most famous for her broadcasting on WUSA (TV) and now is on WRC-TV. I added career beginnings in Korea based on sourced Georgetowner newspaper. I added her radio work and the source is theedge1059.com. I added her husband and kids based off of news broadcasts on newlywed life, pregnancy, life after birth; and based off of Northern Virginia magazine.172.243.128.84 (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

help request

[edit]

I edited this article. Another person added the information and it is sourced. neutralhomer keeps deleting it. If you look at the edit history, since last year neutralhomer has been doing this. Neutralhomer said it removed information per request, request from ? Eposty restored the information. Neutralhomer was told to discuss on article's discussion page but has not done so. I posted about my edits on the discussion page. neutralhomer deleted it, and then threatened me that I will be blocked. I returned my post on the discussion page, neutralhomer deleted it again. Why delete my post on the article discussion page when that is the right way to use wikip to reach consensus. I think neutralhomer needs to be blocked for disruption. neutralhomer is deleting valid sourced information.neutralhomer is deleting discussions on the article take page. 172.243.128.84 (talk) 21:45, 27 March 2014 (UTC) In a further attempt to bully me neutralhomer jsut reported me for 3rr violaton. 172.243.128.84 (talk) 21:59, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple of issues here. Firstly, Wikipedia content should be based on reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Facebook and Twitter clearly do not meet that standard, and since they apparently contradict each other regarding the birthdate, there's no reason to pick one and claim that one reports the truth. Secondly, I'd read "per request" as "per request of the subject". Thirdly, what you added in this edit is a copyright violation; Neutralhomer was right to remove it on sight. Even without the copyright issue it would be irrelevant trivia, and most of the "sources" for that content are anything but reliable. Finally, you were clearly edit-warring on this page to add inappropriate content. So a 3RR report was entirely appropriate. Huon (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angie Goff. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]