Jump to content

Talk:Aneel Mussarat

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

maybe this should go in. http://www.southmanchesterreporter.co.uk/news/s/504974_open_house --87.127.117.246 (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

and this http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1337255_students_homeless_in_flats_safety_scare --87.127.117.246 (talk) 08:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aneel Mussarat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aneel Mussarat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bad reputation / whitewashing

[edit]

Over the past several days, three separate users (Ccn5555, 164.39.43.97 and Qwert001100) have tried to remove information about Mussarat's troubles as a landlord. I invite all three users to enter into a discussion as to why they feel this information (which is, at least in part, reliably cited to a local newspaper) should be removed. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:33, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this should be removed as it is about a company rather than about Mussarat as an individual. I should be under a company page rather than the individual. So it should be removed, please do look into this Qwert001100 (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Qwert001100: The Manchester Evening News story (here) names Mussarat personally as the landlord involved in demolishing tenants' homes while they were still living in them, so I don't know that we can separate the man and his company in this case. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:30, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay what about the other sources, is he named? Qwert001100 (talk) 21:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not that I can tell, but since he is the founder and prime owner of MCR Homes, the company's reputation reflects on him. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:28, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mussarat's notoriety and status is founded solely on his property business and portfolio and this is the MCR Property Group, by virtue of his position as CEO the company's activities and his are one and the same. Grovlin (talk) 10:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2024

[edit]

Remove Trustpilot reference Lucazs1 (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Lucazs1: Can you explain why? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiDan61: I guess because it's WP:OR (interpretation of a primary source). M.Bitton (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton: Is it, though? Yes, TrustPilot can be user-edited, but the point that the article makes is that people have said things. If they've said those things at TrustPilot, is that any different than them saying things to a journalist? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiDan61: it's a not question of whether Truspilot is reliable (it's user generated), but rather whether what is said in it can be interpreted by us (instead of a secondary source). M.Bitton (talk) 19:57, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@M.Bitton: I don't think interpretation is required when reporting direct quotes of users of the site. I will grant that sites like these generally only report negative issues; people rarely take the trouble to report good outcomes. So I'll agree with removing the TrustPilot-sourced material. But the material that is reported in local newspapers should be retained. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@WikiDan61: I was referring to MCR's reputation is rated as bad with incredibly low ratings on Trustpilot, with reviews noting issues with leaks, dampness, security and even sewage leaking from drains and showers Is that the part that you wouldn't mind removing? I have no opinion on the rest (it's not part of the ER). M.Bitton (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@M.Bitton: That part, and the next sentence about the Facebook groups and YouTube videos, for the same reason (individual gripes do not necessarily mean much). I would retain In 2005 Manchester Council had to apply for an injunction to stop Classic Homes demolishing a Whalley Range house that had tenants living in it. as that is source to the Manchester Evening News. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDan61 (talkcontribs) 13:26, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]