Talk:Andromedan (Star Fleet)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek

Board and table games

This redirect is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game

Consolidation would be useful

I don't see a need for both this page and the Andromedan invasion page in Wikipedia. If this were a SFB Wiki (which I would love to see), it would be a different matter. My suggestion would be to touch up this page a bit, and put a redirect on the other until we can clear out all the links.Donovan Ravenhull 13:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the other article is pretty much redundant at this stage - unlike the General War, the Andro invasion can be detailed just fine right here. --Nerroth 20:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Layout changes

Okay, I did some juggling of the layout to make it look a little better. It still has a slight issue with the location of the TOC, but that's adjustable. Also, I took out the two "galaxy" pics. They weren't needed as much and were taking up a lot of screen space. Donovan Ravenhull 11:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original resource

This article is currently chock-a-block with original research. Does someone who knows something about the subject want to take a go at clean-up before I start firing off anti-chuff phasers at it? --Charlesknight 12:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]