Talk:Andriantsimitoviaminiandriana Andriandrazaka

Andriantsimitoviaminiandriana Andriandrazaka has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 19, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Africa: Madagascar Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Madagascar portal This article is supported by WikiProject Madagascar (assessed as High-importance).

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Andriantsimitoviaminiandriana Andriandrazaka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 20:12, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

He became an independent king upon his father's death . Date?

Added.

"the easternmost and largest piece. " Piece seems strange to describe land, territory?

Changed to territory.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'll assume good faith that you'll respond to the two very minor points. For Madagascar in the 1700s it seems a very decent entry.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick review and your comments. I've made the changes you've requested. Cheers, Lemurbaby (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

آخه این چه اسمیه یارو داره ؟

ها ؟! 91.98.223.249 (talk) 18:32, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]