Talk:Andrew Gant
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Andrew Gant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716073649/http://www.classicsonline.com/conductorbio/Andrew_Gant_45166/ to http://www.classicsonline.com/conductorbio/Andrew_Gant_45166/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Cleaning up claims in Political Career section
[edit]I've cleared up claims in the Political Career section to stick to what is actually mentioned in the cited articles, and to replace the journalist-speak 'there have been calls' and similar with specific attribution to the speaker in question (in this case, the leader of the opposition). The article has an ongoing issue that the particular claims chosen are very specifically cherry-picked, suggesting an agenda on the part of the editor who added them, but that's par for the course on politicians' articles. Since I have a COI as a colleague of Cllr Gant I'll restrict myself to just factual tidying. Chris Smowton (talk) 12:31, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- 'Colleague' is a little disingenuous - you are a fellow Liberal Democrat local political activist and politician. Thanks for openly declaring your COI though. It's always going to be difficult to obtain consensus about a NPOV in this article, as AG is a controversial and polarising figure locally who seems determined to promote a pro-cycling agenda to the disadvantage of all other forms of transport in Oxfordshire. --Ef80 (talk) 14:06, 8 September 2023 (UTC)