Talk:Andrew Bruce Holmes

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have deleted the notability-bot's warning as it is superfluous. The article already links to numerous external sites establishing notability. For example, the subject of the article is the recipient of the Royal Society's Royal Medal, almost every other recipient of which has their own Wikipedia page. The article contains several links to independent sites confirming this and other awards, establishing notability. Ian Henty Holmes (talk) 23:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't a bot who added the notability tag, it was a person. It isn't superfluous. There are no independent, reliable references about him. His own publications do not count. There are no links to any awards. Bgwhite (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I do apologize for thinking it was a bot. And thank you for your attention to this page, which I would like to strive to ensure meets all Wikipedia guidelines. I recognize that his publications don't count; I'd thought that a link to a Wikipedia page of Royal Medallists, plus a press release from his institution about the award, would count. My mistake... I've now added a link to the Royal Society website, which I trust is an independent and reliable source (it's the UK Commonwealth's premier scientific institution, roughly comparable to the US National Academy, the Israel Academy, the Chinese Academy, etc.) Again, thank you for your explanation: it is sometimes tricky to understand the correct approach. Ian Henty Holmes (talk) 08:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add one more footnote re notability: the annual Royal Medal is for the three most important contributions in science in the UK Commonwealth. This list of medallists http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Royal_Medal confirms that from 1826 through to the present day, all but two of the recipients have Wikipedia pages. So this is a very prestigious award, which would appear to be sufficient to establish notability, now that we have evidence in the form of an independent link to the Royal Society's own website Ian Henty Holmes (talk) 08:15, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration of interest: I am related to the subject of this article and I am one of the contributors. This connection was flagged on the page, with an encouragement to discuss on the talk page, so I've moved that discussion here. I've tried for a neutral point of view in my edits; with imperfect success, I am sure, as true objectivity can be tricky. I welcome advice from more experienced Wikipedians, in order to improve the quality of this article, and ensure it meets neutrality guidelines. Please let me know if there are any more specific concerns. Thanks again for your attention Ian Henty Holmes (talk) 08:05, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Andrew Bruce Holmes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]