Jump to content

Talk:Andrea Levin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Who is noteworthy? Levin is he head of a non-profit advocacy group with tens of thousands of members. They make a lot of noise, and she gets quoted constantley. I think she is someone it would be interesting to know more about. American Clio (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)American Clio[reply]

Notability - I am puzzled to understand why this has to be an adversarial process. Why do psople post things like "three mentions in the media does not make a person widely quoted" I'm not Levin's advocate. I would like to know more about hher so I put up a brief article.

Certainly this article passes the nsiff test, i.e., she is the head of a large media watchdog organization.

Perhaps the Wikipedia policy should be to let such articles stand for a while and see whether material is added to justify notability. American Clio (talk) 13:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)American Clio[reply]


21:13, 21 February 2008 Boodlesthecat (Talk | contribs) (1,326 bytes) (3 brief mentions does not equal "widely quoted"

How many would? 30? 300?

The point is to put up a representative sampling form serious places. In this case, books on media bias. American Clio (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2008 (UTC)American Clio[reply]

I'd recommend that you find a reliable source (see WP:RS) that says something to the effect that "Ms Levin is widely quoted.." and source it to that. Otherwise you are doing a bit of original research (see WP:OR), but more importantly, you won't have to worry about counting quotations. Boodlesthecat (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAMERA

[edit]

CAMERA are pro-Israel in the US; does this not make them part of the Israel lobby in the United States? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, their focus is on media accuracy, not on influencing legislation or foreign policy. Hertz1888 (talk) 02:56, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I take the point from the second half of your reply. The first I'm not so sure of.

Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 09:40, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/manager/features/display_message.asp?mid=593
    Triggered by \bpmwatch\.org\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 01:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:15, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Andrea Levin which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.pmwatch.org/pmw/manager/features/display_message.asp?mid=593
    Triggered by \bpmwatch\.org\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]