This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Most secondary sources call them the Andrea Doria class (or simply the Doria class), not the Caio Duilio class - this is probably because Andrea Doria was launched first. In any case, we follow what reliable secondary sources say. Parsecboy (talk) 11:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The Italians are calling it the "Duilio class". It would seem to me the Regia Marina would have presidence over an English language secondary source. See Italian language wikipedia pages for Regia Marina and Caio Duilio Class battleships. On the other hand, the Japanese Zero fighter page is titled Mitsubishi A6M Zero, not the Type 0 Navy Carrier Fighter. Reliable secondary sources would be the rule, but sources in English or in Italian? Not sure about that.Gunbirddriver (talk) 03:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Long-established practice is to follow English-language sources for article titles. It's why, for instance, we have the article at Novak Djokovic, not Novak Đoković. Continental navies tend to name a class of ships after the first vessel completed, while Anglo-Americans tend to name it after the first ship launched. The US Colorado class is usually referred to as the Maryland class in Europe for this reason. Parsecboy (talk) 12:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
At the time work started on expanding this article both Brit and AmEng were being used. No attempt was made to find out what it used in the beginning, but it is being rewritten in AmEng.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Curiously, the original version used a mixture - "modernized" but also "armour." Perhaps it's some other variant - Canadian or Australian English that I'm not particularly familiar with. Parsecboy (talk) 19:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The photo currently used at the top of the pages is NOT an Andrea Doria class, as the midships turret is mounted a deck higher than it should be. Therefore, it's a Conte di Cavour class, but I don't know which one. Nor do I have a replacement photo, so I'll leave replacement to someone who does 185.253.176.35 (talk) 14:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]