Talk:Ancrene Wisse

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Ancrene Wisse is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huh?

Yeah, I don't think many of us speak Middle English. How about a translation? 74.197.58.211 (talk) 01:31, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Various translations have been published, e.g. M. B. Salu, 1955; Hugh White: London : Penguin, 1993 (Penguin Classics).--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 07:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone care to post a translation on this page? Telling us where to look is all well and good for those with the time and inclination to do further research -- but does nothing for those of us just browsing Wikipedia. Cheers, -- Erik Anderson, 67.182.137.135 (talk) 06:27, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's very long, and the translations are in copyright. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priority

It was editec by Herbert and Day, in 1944-52. Tolkien was not first. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If Shepherd's work is so substantial, shouldn't there be a bibliographical reference to it?

Contents of the document?

How do we have a particularly long article on this document that says nearly nothing about its contents? If anything, that should come first, followed afterwards by the academic linguistic and historical info that basically makes up this whole article.....

24.69.100.27 (talk) 02:58, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Try the lead? Johnbod (talk) 03:07, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, oh master of sarcasm. Obviously I was looking for something more substantial than that. Imagine an article on the Bible where the lede mentioned how many books were in the Old Testament, then how many were in the New. And then covered at length some linguistic and philological manuscript issues. At least if this lede could give me an idea if this monastic rule is similar to other rules I know of, or if it contrasts in some notable way. Anything. But I will just have to find a resource other than Wikipedia. Thanks.

24.69.100.27 (talk) 09:23, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]