Talk:Anchises

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ancient Near East–related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disability

Anchises is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): VJKTK5. Peer reviewers: TiffaniHunter.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Version

The article says "One version is that Aphrodite pretended to be a Phrygian princess and seduced him for nearly two weeks of lovemaking." What's the source for this version? ICE77 (talk) 05:37, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aphrodite/Venus

Shouldn't Venus be used instead of Aphrodite, since Anchises figures more prominently in Roman mythology? 64.79.43.183 (talk) 18:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think your point is valid in so far as he is perhaps best known in popular mythology for his place in the Roman genealogical scheme and the Aeneid, but he is a prominent figure in Greek mythology first and foremost. The vast majority of ancient texts that mention him are Greek, and the currency of the Roman side of things on the street will be from traditions below the Aeneid-crook in the hourglass of the mythographical corpus. I'd stick with Aphrodite, and Venus and Rome are already prominent enough in this small article. ^davidiad _.:τ 19:26, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's a prominent figure in Roman legend first and foremost, but there's no reason to use interpretatio graeca for talking about the Homeric hymns. — LlywelynII 04:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Project

Hi all. I am going to be editing this article for a college course. I plan to add citations for the material that does not have clear citations or delete the material if I cannot identify the source. I will also be adding two sections containing more detailed information about Anchises. The first section will be about Anchises in the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite. The second section will be about Anchises in the Aeneid. VJKTK5 (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2016 (UTC)VJKTK5[reply]

Pronunciations

Well, Wikipedia is WP:NOTADICTIONARY and pronunciations usually go at Wiktionary entries. That said, it's probably useful for our readers to learn that this is the hard Grecian /kʰ/ and not the usual /tʃ/ they might be expecting. That said, there's absolutely no reason to have the (unsourced, supposed) ancient Greek pronunciation /aŋkʰíːsɛːs/ here instead of at Wiktionary. Anyone wanting to delve that deeply into linguistics should head over there where they can break it down by Attic, Koine, dialect, etc. — LlywelynII 04:35, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The ancient Greeks pronounced the name "Anchises" actually: /ɑːnˈkiːseɪz/ but /aŋkʰíːsɛːs/ is the correct pronunciation as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Correct-44 (talk • contribs) 14:15, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, /ɑːnˈkiːseɪz/ or /ɑːnˈkiːseɪs/ is about as close as you can get to the original pronunciation if you're an American (but they don't actually say it like that). It's not a Greek pronunciation. Kbb2 (ex. Mr KEBAB) (talk) 14:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]