Talk:Anatolian languages/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about Anatolian languages. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Untitled
This article might as well mention (or list) all the languages classified as Anatolian languages. Alexander 007 07:23, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
While Lycian is considered to be clearly a descendant of Luwian (though possibly of a dialect slightly different from those attested), Lydian is not considered by Anatolianists to be a descendant of either Hittite or Luwian. No such claim is to be found in the specialist literature. The only place I have encountered it is on some amateur websites, where no evidence for the claim is given. To be sure, I consulted Craig Melchert, one of the leading Anatolianists, who confirmed that none of the experts consider Lydian a descendant of Hittite or Luwian. Talk of "admixture" of Hittite is not only unsupported by the literature but is vague. "Admixture" is not a technical term in historical linguistics. What is this intended to mean?Bill 06:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Anatolian languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091008065624/http://www.unc.edu:80/~melchert/lydian.pdf to http://www.unc.edu/~melchert/lydian.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:58, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Anatolian languages. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unc.edu/~melchert/lydian.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120205215306/http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/iedocctr/ie-lg/Anatolian.html to http://www.utexas.edu/cola/centers/lrc/iedocctr/ie-lg/Anatolian.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110520043043/http://www.premiumwanadoo.com/cuneiform.languages/index_en.php?page=accueil to http://www.premiumwanadoo.com/cuneiform.languages/index_en.php?page=accueil
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Rewrites & Additions
I've rewritten and expanded much of the article to provide better sourcing and explanation of the features of the language family, as well as clarify the thornier issues around gender and other archaisms. Any commentary or additional sourcing for the phonology and grammar would be welcome. TheLateDentarthurdent (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
outdated literature
The references 2,3 are since long outdated. The latest Bouckaert et al. corrections by Atkinson, regarding a severe counting error and significantly younger dates, was published in Science 2013.2A02:8108:9640:AC3:8093:582B:458:ED0C (talk) 17:17, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Rigidly ordered slots
No doubt this is true, but as written this may strike the reader as more remarkable than it really is. In English we say walkers' but not *walks'er, and we could describe the situation as just such a rigid ordering, demanding that the verb-to-agent-noun-particle -er must precede the plural marker -s, which itself must come before the genitive marker ' (I am glossing over the fact that this last marker is mute, which explains incidentally why so few people know how to spell it). 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:90BF:94E1:70DD:6587 (talk) 08:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Turkish
Removed: "Some words descended from the Anatolian languages may still live in the modern Turkish language, especially place names such as Side and Adana."
First of all, place names are not words. Second of all, no source was provided. Third of all, this was added together with fringe material that was already deleted by another editor.
While there MIGHT actually be Hittite words that passed into Greek and thence into Turkish, the words provided by the person who added this material were not among them. If anyone has a scholarly source for Turkish words that can be traced back to Hittite, please add.Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 21:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Toponyms are too words! But they are not core lexical items, which is what they would have to be in order that the point be remarkable at all. Otherwise Terlincthun in Pas-de-Calais would count as evidence that Dutch "lives on" in French (which is incidentally true, but has to be attested by proper lexical items such as the word houle). 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:90BF:94E1:70DD:6587 (talk) 08:39, 9 June 2022 (UTC)