Jump to content

Talk:Anandabazar Patrika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Political affiliations

[edit]

The comment about rightist and leftist is an opinion. The newspaper makes no reference to either. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dineshjain (talkcontribs) 12:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The reference to being an independent newspaper has been added. --Victor D PARLE 23:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To say that Anandabazar is leftist is blasphemous for Anandabazar as well as the leftists. I believe its the most neutral broadsheet newspaper in Bangla, and it could be a Bartaman Patrika (an ultra-right but anti-industry broadsheet) person which has alleged this. I have no evidence though, but the immediate reference to Bartaman looks ominous. BTW, Bartaman is the "unofficial" mouthpiece of Ms Mamata Banerjee 203.124.221.53 15:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Santanu[reply]

The ultra-leftists are trying to brand Anandabazar as a pro-CPI(M)newspaper. But the newspaper, it seems, has a consistent editorial policy which is fortunately or unfortuantely pro-liberalization. CPI(M) government has accepted the realities of the globalization process and trying to get best out of it for the state which they have ruled for last years and their party and the their front partners. Anandabazar appreciates that and has been accordingly engaging constructive criticism of the West Bengal government. Many naxalites who once joined Anandabazar to try their journalistic guns against the CPI(M) find this very dissappointing. But they have to toe the line dictated by their employer. They have to give in and compromise with the whims of their owner. Their blind anti-CPMism and anti-capitalism, which has fuelled unrest all over West Bengal will not go well with their employer. bad luck. That is why they have been reading and supporting editorial policies of Doinik Statesman and Bartaman. The latter papers have only one policy i.e. to report lies and damn lies. Ananda bazar is only paper that gives impartial news and provides the reader with informed and responsible views—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sarasij (talkcontribs) 15:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

THE ABOVE WRITING STYLE IS NOT TUNED WITH THE TRADITIONAL WIKIPEDIA WRITINGS. EDITORS PLEASE LOOK INTO THE MATTER !!—Preceding unsigned comment added by Legalpoet (talkcontribs) 05:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most interesting.

[edit]

Most interesting to see what people think of ABP's political leanings. But I'm only here to recommend a merge with the other ABP article. It might make sense to have a page on the paper, and a different page on the company, but not two on the paper. Rimi talk contribs 11:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Circulations

[edit]

What is the proper reference to the line:

"With 1,130,167 daily copies, it has the largest circulation for a single-edition, regional language newspaper in India."

The current reference does not show circulations.

Thanks.--Maksud 10:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anandabazar_Patrika&action=edit&section=new —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.187.37.188 (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Delhi edition

[edit]

Anandabazar Patrika's New Delhi edition has been discontinued quite some time back. And this was not so much of an edition, it was just the Kolkata paper printed in New Delhi. It even carried the daily pullout supplement containing Kolkata news.

what to do

[edit]

I am a student of Bengali (Hons) and have just finished my B.A final year examination. I had Journalism and Sociology as my pass subject. I want to know what will I do after my graduation.If u kindly give answer of my question then I will be very grateful to you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.193.54 (talk) 06:26, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode

[edit]

I have added an web address through which the online edition of this daily can be viewed in Unicode Bengali. The link is: Anandabazar Patrika in Unicode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trinanjon (talkcontribs) 09:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

publication dated 13.10.2011

[edit]

please let me know about publication 13.10.2011 matter connected with land equitation of NH2 road beside. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.96.63 (talk) 16:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Park Street Heroin

[edit]

Aporadhirao amader somajer 1ta ongso.. Tara aporadh korbei, tader manobikota bole kichhu nei.. But tai bole shudhu ader uporei dosh dile hobena.. Amader keo bujhte hobe o jante hobe nijeder ke protect korte..@ case of Park street, the woman, oto ratre drink korechhilen.. ata normal bepar.. but kar varosai tini drink korechhilen?? ke onake or barite niye jeto?? onaro barite to ma, maye achhe.. Drink korben ki korben na ata onar personal bepar but night club a uni aka chhilen o drink matra-ti-rikto korechhilen.. Ata khub e durvaggo jonok je uni rape hoyechhilen but onar aro responsibility thaka uchit chhilo.. Tahole hoito ba amon ghatona arano possible hoto.. Mayeder kakhonoi achena purush er upor depend haoa uchit noi.. Amra aporadhi der tatokkhon na somaj theke muchhe felte parbo jatokkhon se tar aporadh er identity-r prokash ghotachhe.. but ata jodi tader ke korte deoar sujog kore deoa hoi tahole khoti ta amader e hobe.. Tai baje-valo manus niyei somaj achhe r thakbe.. aporadhider puropuri nasto kora kakhonoi possible noi.. So, please be carefull..

'This is Comment on Face Book Mr. Suman Dey. You are destroying moral values of our society to do politics agains Smt. Mamata Banerjee.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.193.135.110 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trimmed

[edit]

The article has been trimmed down, all unnecessary and unverified material has been removed. Krishna Kumar 18:48, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Reverted! --Tito Dutta 22:57, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also add talk page link in your signature! --Tito Dutta 23:02, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Please mention your reasons for the reversions,as the removal of the above content was according to wikipedia's guidelines, regarding unverifiable sources, where no reasonable/suitable citations have been provided for. -- Krishna Kumar (Talk @ Wiki) 22:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This was the reason why the page was edited/trimmed:

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2012)



---Reverting the last edit.--- Help:Manual reverting--- -- Krishna Kumar (Talk @ Wiki) 22:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]