Talk:Anal leakage

This article was nominated for deletion on July 6, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Olestra

I removed much of the discussion of olestra as it seemed to rely on much of the "anal leakage" humor of the mid-90s rather than thoughtful analysis. I removed mention of olestra from the leading sentence (as this is an article about anal leakage, and not olestra) as well as slimming down the "diet" section. Instead, the reader can see the olestra article for more info. CranialNerves 10:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think the part about olestra is against NPOV? It seems to imply that the whole thing is nonsense and untrue, which is not the case. 85.75.246.1 00:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This needs pictures

138.88.79.149 21:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you volunteering? --Sam Blanning^(talk) 08:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

uncited

"Anal leakage affects about 2% of adults." Well, I do happen to pity these people, but until this fact is cited, I have no reason to believe it is but a scam (OK, not quite that far, but it makes me question the validity of the entire page when there isn't a single citation)!

Is the claim regarding a study done at the University of Edinburgh in 1999 on George Silber in realtion to anal intercourse and "anal laeakage" sound or just another BOGUS???

turned into disambiguation page

I feel that ppl typing in "anal leakage" might be looking for one of several pages on wiki, so I added a disambig pageTepi (talk) 22:13, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]