Talk:An Appeal to All that Doubt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

There is absolutely no reason to delete this page on the books of William Law. All sources have been mentioned, and I am the copyright holder of “The Spiritual Side of Samuel Richardson”. Han and Gerda Hanengerda (talk) 18:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because all sources have been mentioned. I am the copyright owner of The Spiritual Side of Samuel Richardson which has only been used as reference in the footnotes. All the quotations are from the original book written by William Law in 1742. I personally own this first edition of the Appeal of 1742. So there is absolutely no copyright infringement! Best regards, Han and Gerda Hanengerda (talk) 18:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Hanengerda: I think this was a well-intended but misplaced concern that it was copying a digital work here: http://ota.ox.ac.uk/text/3125.html. However, since it is just a transcription of a centuries-old book, there is no copyright violation. Another editor has removed the speedy template. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Drm310, thank you so much for your speedy reaction. We are both, Han and I, very relieved by your answer. Thank you very much indeed! Best regards, Hanengerda (talk) 18:51, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]