Talk:Amplified fragment length polymorphism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Clarification?

"... followed by ligation of complementary double stranded adaptors to the ends of the restriction fragments."

I don't understand this phrase. Similarly "... ligation of restriction half-site specific adaptors to all restriction fragments.". Presumably this is the same thing?

"A subset of the restriction fragments are then amplified using two primers complementary to the adaptor and restriction site fragments."

Does this mean that the primers span the end of the fragment and the adaptor?

OK, I think I got it now... I have tried to reword the article to make this clearer, but I may have screwed it up a bit in the process... --Dan|^(talk) 13:22, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amplified fragment length polymorphism → AFLP — AFLP has never been an acronym and the title of this page suggests it is. See the Discussion of the original Vos et al. 1995 paper where it they state explicitly that it is not an acronym. Furthermore, the use of it as an acronym is misleading because it suggests that the method results in length polymorphisms, which it does not. Disequilibber (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Oppose – Google scholar search finds thousands of papers that include the string "Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)", and only one with the words "AFLP is not an acronym". Whatever the original intention of the authors, the acronym clearly stands for the words in most reliable sources. Dicklyon (talk) 04:28, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support – This article's purpose should be to present accurate information and not perpetuate confusion. As stated above, not only is AFLP NOT an acronym, pretending that it stands for "...Length Polymorphisms" is particularly misleading.

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Amplified fragment length polymorphism/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page sounds like a sales pitch for Keygene. Since they lnk to their page as well, it probably is.

Last edited at 03:29, 5 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 07:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Amplified fragment length polymorphism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]