This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
Alexmazzucca (talk·contribs) has been paid by Impax Laboratories. Their editing has included contributions to this article. Partial disclosure here; Clarifying he is freelancing here
The user who recently overhauled this page, Alexmazzucca (talk·contribs), removed several adequately-referenced sections from the article about litigation and recalls, without explanation or seeking of consensus. I have re-introduced those sections to the article, but the article now reads like a brochure from the company rather than an encyclopedia article. Given the user's lack of edits on any other article and the fact that the user has yet to respond to my request for explanation on their talk page, it seems likely that there is a conflict of interest. A quick google search of their user name turns up a web developer. It's possible that these were paid edits. —Hermionedidallthework (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]