Talk:Ammonium fluorosilicate
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Ammonium hexafluorosilicate
[edit]I have since started to build an article for ammonium hexafluorosilicate. It is important in discussing bararite and cryptohalite. I have adapted a term paper for mineralogy for the article on bararite. Johnny Mineralogist (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Health issues
[edit]Seems three of us were editing simultaneously... Anyway the "Health issues" section was removed (now back) as it was redundant with info in the "Chemical properties and uses" section - probably should have removed it from that section instead. Vsmith (talk) 04:28, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- ...and already fixed. Vsmith (talk) 04:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Overcategorization with a non-approved and invalid chemical name
[edit]The Category:Silanuides is presently disputed on the Chemistry Portal at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemicals
as other overspecialized subcategories created in general categories such as , e.g.:
Only useful names and relevant categories (i.e., grouping together a reasonable number of pages to ease navigation and discoveries) make sense for the reader. It is also important not to mislead the Wikipedia audience, nor to foster questionable nomenclature practices.
Please, do not change the official IUPAC name, nor add a hyperspecialized category without consensus after discussion on the Chemistry Portal. Thanks, Shinkolobwe (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Mismatch between graphic and formula ?
[edit]Hi Chemists and Mineralogists,
for a layman the graphic shown on the upper right does not match the formula. There are too many NH/4- grid elements. Can you explain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.154.199.77 (talk) 13:08, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ammonium fluorosilicate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526142134/http://www.polymorf.net/matter4.htm to http://www.polymorf.net/matter4.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://article.pubs.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/ppv/RPViewDoc?issn=1480-3291&volume=53&issue=22&startPage=3394 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090526142134/http://www.polymorf.net/matter4.htm to http://www.polymorf.net/matter4.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)