Jump to content

Talk:Ammonia (data page)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

UV-Vis spectrum of ammonia

[edit]

Since ammonia has no chromophore, I expect that it would have no absorption in the UV-Visible region of the spectrum. I put down "None" for both the Lambda-max and extinction coefficient in the Table, although I admit I have not seen a UV-Vis spectrum of ammonia. I have not found any information on the net about this, probably because there is nothing to say about such absorptions. Does anybody know this empirically? H Padleckas 06:39, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admittedly, I forgot about the vacuum UV region, since I practically never did spectra in a vacuum in that region. H Padleckas 10:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

van der Waals' and heat and entropy of fusion (and entropy of vaporization) added by me (log indicates anonymous contribution, but that's because wiki had logged me out). Karlhahn 03:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CHERIC data

[edit]

CHERIC is really an impressive source of data, esp. for polynomial approximation data, but it seems to be lacking any information about the validity range of the expressions, and their accuracy?

Any idea, what we are talking about, for the data on this page?

I ask, because the gas heat capacity data seems to be at least one percent off the tabulated data (although the conditions of that datapoint is not specified - I'm assuming std. conditions).

It's also a few percent different from i.e. the data given on http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ammonia-d_971.html (37 J/mol*K at 15deg.C, where the CHERIC formula evaluates to 35,54). Tøpholm (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge onto Ammonia

[edit]

I think we should merge this onto Ammonia 76.124.224.179 (talk) 13:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ammonia (data page). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ammonia (data page). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]