Talk:American Sportscopter Ultrasport 331

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American Sportscopter Ultrasport 331 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

CorenSearchBot error

The CorenSearchBot tagged this article as a possible copywrite vio from http://readtiger.com/wkp/en/American_Sportscopter_Ultrasport_254. That website is a Wikipedia mirror that has a copy of the similar Ultrasport 254 article, the sister model to this one. There is no copyright violation and the bot needs fixing to avoid these obvious errors in the future. - Ahunt (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is obviously a false positive, agreed. But the bot is doing a great job overall; it couldn't really have known that the content at Ultrasport 254 was also written by you! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOLZ, thanks for your comment! It just shows how circular the internet has become. All roads lead to Wikipedia! - Ahunt (talk) 12:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Just a thought: if you happen to re-use content, even your own content, again, you'd make life a touch easier for those few mugs who follow up after the bot if you place a {{copied}} tag on the relevant talkpages. It's not required in a case like this one, but doesn't do any great harm either. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:05, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is a good thought. In this case one was not copied from the other, but both were written from one of a series of off-line .txt templates that I have for different aircraft type categories, in this case helicopters. The two articles really weren't that much alike. - Ahunt (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]