Talk:America COMPETES Act

Untitled

Agreed -- Senate has not yet passed the reauthorization. Text corrected. Terminalwally (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

2010 act is not law yet - fix this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.111.15.145 (talk) 13:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure why this is redirecting to the Research page. The two do not seem to be related. I added this in my edit comments, but my edit was reverted.

I agree. At least leave the page blank until more info is found. Kimberly M. (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Dead link

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070809-6.html

Full Decent (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm trying to put more meat on the bones of this page. I cannot find any reference to 'Research and Development tax credits' in the legislation, so I am deleting that phrase from the page. Millerj870 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC).

With the addition of concrete information from the Act, the following seemed redundant and less than informative

... the creation of a Teacher Corps program (reference to legislation?), an increase in skilled workers visas and increased science funding (reference to legislation?).

so I deleted it. What is now here on the Act of 2007 probably needs some smoothing out, but the content seems complete and well-references. Millerj870 (talk) 18:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Next I want to put links from the article to the various NSF programs that are mentioned by name. The links should go to the NSF solicitations. Millerj870 (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on America COMPETES Act. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527094918/http://science.house.gov/RelatedByTag.aspx?KeywordID=38 to http://science.house.gov/RelatedByTag.aspx?KeywordID=38
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111222171817/http://www.commerce.gov/Competes to http://www.commerce.gov/competes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Problems with this page

I read about the COMPETES Act in the Washington Post and came here to find out more about it. This is 6,000 words of dense text mostly copied or paraphrased from the original text, which is discouraged by WP:OR, and it's difficult to figure out what's really going on. If I were an editor, or an instructor, I would tell the writer to tear it up and start over.

Failing that, I would start out by condensing all the profuse wordage, such as, "The America COMPETES Act of 2007 has many provisions in its 146 pages."

Wikipedia is supposed to be sourced from WP:RS which has the effect of filtering it through books and articles written by people who understand the bill and can identify what's really going on.

For example, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/06/26/competes-act-congress-us-seminconductors-fall-behind-china/ "Semiconductor legislation failures show why the U.S. struggles to compete," Washington Post, by David Ignatius, which says that the bill has fallen victim to the "Christmas tree" effect, which means that because it's a must-pass bill, congressmen are attaching their pet projects to it.

What is this bill really doing? One major provision is immigration, which is supposed to make it easier for foreign STEM workers to get Green Cards and citizenship. This is described for example in the secondary source WP:RS https://immigrationforum.org/article/analysis-immigration-provisions-in-the-america-competes-act/ Analysis: Immigration Provisions in the America COMPETES Act. As part of the Christmas tree, this bill includes provisions for considering Hong Kongers and Uyghurs as eligible for asylum, and for granting citizenship to non-citizen adoptees of American citizens.

The conventional wisdom is that international trade provisions have winners and losers. I'd like to see what WP:RS say about what the COMPETE Act does to compensate the American workers who are displaced by highly-educated immigrants. And the provisions for helping American students get STEM education as described in this entry are pretty confusing. It seems like a laundry list (or Christmas list) of uncoordinated pet projects. I'd like to know what science educators think we need and whether this bill meets those needs.

I'm going to see whether Science magazine has covered this. They're usually good at getting to the point. --Nbauman (talk) 17:20, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

yup, I just checked Science magazine and they have more stories than I can count. Try a Google search for site:science.org “America Competes Act” 2022 . (Unfortunately Google doesn't list them by date.) There's a lot of controversy, and a lot of people found a lot of problems with it, for example, on immigration and geographical distribution of the funding. --Nbauman (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2023 and 6 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Choff324 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Choff324 (talk) 04:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Bibliography

• Furman, J. L. (2013). The America competes acts: The future of US physical science and ... Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/668241
  • This is a peer-reviewed article is an evaluation of the America COMPETES Act of 2007, and what it did for Americas physical science and engineering. The journal paper is from 2013 and notes that at the time of writing, many of the funds and programs did not ever come to fruition.
• Congressional Research Service. (2015, July 27). The America Competes Acts: An Overview. EveryCRSReport.com. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R43880.html
  • This is a summary of the America COMPETES Act. It highlights the goals of the Act, and gives a summary of what the act has done.
• National Immingration Forum. (2022, March 29). Analysis: Immigration provisions in the america COMPETES act. National Immigration Forum. Retrieved May 1, 2023, from https://immigrationforum.org/article/analysis-immigration-provisions-in-the-america-competes-act/#:~:text=The%20bill%20would%20exempt%20immigrants,backlog%20or%20per%2Dcountry%20caps.
  • This article shows an intersectionality between the STEM legislation and immigration, which is has not yet been covered on the current Wiki Page

Please let me know if any of these should not be included. They seem neutral and reliable to me. Choff324 (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)