Talk:Ambrosini SAI.207

Military history: Aviation / Technology / European / Italian / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

575kmh or 630kmh speed? However, pilots weren't so happuy as the agility of this fighter, nor the structure, better for a racer aircraft, was satisfactory as well.--80.104.204.98 09:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows? Moreover, the S.403 was even more controvertial: how can be faster than S.207 with the same engine and 200 kg more, not to talk about aerodynamic, less versed in speed and more as agility (bigger wings, more drag)? There are values of 650 kmh, simply out of the realm of reality, but also 560 km/h, well more reliable but still, a bit low to justify the entusiam and order 3000 machines. In every cases, something is not clear. I don't think that S.207 was faster than C.202 or S.403 to C.205, that had twice hp.--Stefanomencarelli 20:08, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

575 km/h is the right i've a pdf copy of RA document, 575 km/h at 5.5 km high, the planes was slow in climb 7' and 34" for 6 km, and this datas are for a prototype, they are sure a bit badest for pre production planes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.49.239.26 (talk) 11:24, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-write

I have re-written this article but only had limited references, relying on the original article. I would appreciate it if anybody could add referencces.Petebutt (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]