Jump to content

Talk:Amazing Red

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tagged

[edit]

I have tagged this article because of some praise being shown for the guy in the article.

Jonathan Barber Namecheck taken out

[edit]

Per discussion with administrator User:Durova, the Jonathan Barber (banned User:JB196 namecheck is being taken out as a violation of WP:VAIN, WP:SPAM, and WP:OWN

Dubious

[edit]

Being as there's no citation present (one way or the other), it's evident to conclude that someone who has ten years' experience on Red likely began using the moves before he did, and that Red "copied" or "paid homage" (somewhat common in wrestling) to Rey rather than the other way around. Can anyone support either side of the claim? If not, I'm going to remove the section in a little while. Tromboneguy0186 04:24, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The earliest entry on the internet of Red performing the move was in October 2002. Rey was using the 619 in July 2002 on WWE Television.DrRisk13 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)--(talk) 23:21, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even then, the 619 is not solely named for the area code...As the move involves a 360 spin, the circular motion is supposed to look like 619, while 718 resembles no particular shape DrNickPhD (talk) 20:01, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

amazing red's new finisher

[edit]

Didn't he use an inverted hurricarana in his 4 way match on tna last week. Shouldn't that be his finisher move because he pinned Creed with that move.Crossfire96 (talk) 14:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Red

[edit]

There are tons of photos of Amazing Red; just look on images.google.com. Why hasn't a photo of Red been uploaded? I'd upload it, but I don't know how.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because a random image from google does not fall within Pedia's copyright guidelines.--WillC 22:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amazing Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Amazing Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amazing Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]