Talk:Amatory fiction

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

[Untitled]

This is a new article. Most of the information for this article came from "Sex, Lies, and Invisibility: Amatory Fiction from the Restoration to Mid-Century," written by Toni O'Shaughnessy Bowers. This article can be found in The Columbia History of the British Novel, edited by John Richetti.

142.150.17.243 (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this article neglects the satirical quality of amatory fiction. For example, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography describes Delarivier Manley's narrative publications as "anti-Whig satire veiled as romance." That doesn't sound like a 'precursor to the modern romance novel' to me.

142.150.17.243 (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could be both. As Bowers says in the article you cite, "amatory fiction" is a pretty wide-ranging category. — scribbling woman 13:05, 25 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Swerve"

I would guess that this is a modern critical term, not 17th-century terminology... AnonMoos (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]