Talk:Alyssa Nicole Pallett

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Not pornography

Alyssa Pallett is not a nude model, and no pornographic photos of her can be found online. Her role in American Pie as the "porn chick" was a comedic acting role, and is not a real porn star. Her appearance in "The Girls Next Door" was also non-pornographic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brigitteslips (talk • contribs) 20:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

question about COI

Can someone please inform on how to understand the note on my article stating: "A major contributor to this article appears to have a conflict of interest with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page." I need to know how to improve the neutral point of view apparently, not sure what needs to be fixed on the article in order to comply better with content policies. Any help greatly appreciated! --Brigitteslips (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to make the article more neutral, mostly by removing excess linking and marginal references. the language is fine as far as i can see, just the overall presentation looked a little promotional. one link for each article linked to is very important WMOS. also, the repetition of information in each section is probably not needed for a stub article. you probably arent really COI, unless you have a stake in her business. but being a fan means just being aware this is an encyco article not a fan page(which it doesnt sound like anyway). but aside from some bad links, which show more of a lack of familiarity than bias, the article is fine by me. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]