This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
"The KSL/Aspen/Mammoth/Intrawest deal was the largest in skiing history, pulling together Steamboat, Winter Park, Blue Mountain, Stratton, Mount Tremblant, Snowshoe, Squaw Valley, Alpine Meadows, Aspen, Mammoth, June Mountain, Bear Mountain, Snow Summit, and heli ski giant Canadian Mountain Holidays, plus all the attendant lodging and retail operations, trademarks, corporate partnership deals, and more than 1,000 acres of prime developable real estate. Vail Resorts had shown the way. And now, from the high plains of Colorado, another behemoth was born: a Godzilla to Vail's King Kong." https://www.powder.com/stories/features/epic-world/
I've found/added cites from USA Today, Forbes, Aspen Times, Denver Post, Salt Lake Tribune, Skiing Magazine. There are many others. My view is that notability is not in doubt and that the delete discussion was premature. I'm not sure how to revert the delete decision, but according to WP:ORGCRIT
"A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." That criteria has been clearly met here. Other opinions? Mr. Swordfish (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Forbes, USA Today, Denver Post, and SLC Tribune seems sufficient to me, but please remember to use a template on references, such as Template:Cite web, for traceability (some refs go dead and the bots can recall archives, see this edit if you need a guide). But I would also not be opposed to some articles merging here in regards to the companies that became this one. Yosemiter (talk) 17:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]