Talk:Alpha Omega Alpha/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Notable Members
This list should be in alphabetical order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.136.100 (talk) 16:24, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Alpha Omega Alpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090711001755/http://www.aamc.org:80/students/eras/resources/downloads/2010myerasresidency.pdf to http://www.aamc.org/students/eras/resources/downloads/2010myerasresidency.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alpha Omega Alpha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921060139/http://oculus.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=nlmfindaid%3Bcc%3Dnlmfindaid%3Bview%3Dreslist%3Bsubview%3Dstandard%3Bdidno%3Daoa271 to http://oculus.nlm.nih.gov/cgi/f/findaid/findaid-idx?c=nlmfindaid%3Bcc%3Dnlmfindaid%3Bview%3Dreslist%3Bsubview%3Dstandard%3Bdidno%3Daoa271
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Restoration of Controversies section and NPOV issues
I have restored a section on Controversies that was removed last year, despite it being notable information that was reliably sourced. The comments left by the anonymous editor did not provide valid Wiki policy reasons for their deletion, and implied a personal bias or conflict of interest in their edits. And it seems that no one chose to take the back-and-forth revisions to the Talk page, to request a consensus on deletion of that section.
The removal of that section, as well as text like "one-of-a-kind" and "beacon for medical humanities" suggest that much of the editing of this page does not adhere to WP:PROMO. In addition, there are several claims made in the article without any sources to verify them, such as, "ΑΩΑ membership is recognized by medical institutions and practices around the world, and offers an advantage for members applying for residencies, fellowships and permanent career positions." Obviously the page requires NPOV review, which is why I have added the Advert tag to it; because there's too much for me to do on my own, in any kind of timely manner.
To avoid undoing any standard maintenance edits that have been made since the removal of the Controversies section, I have pulled the text from the last version which included it, and restored it manually. If you believe the section should not exist, please give your reasons on the Talk page, so they can be discussed to a consensus, before you delete it.
I feel like there's too much there to start throwing "needs reference" tags all over the article text, but I will try to work my way through each section and source or remove information as I go. If you do see something in particular that needs cleanup, and you don't have time to do it yourself, please add it as a section to the Talk page. CleverTitania (talk) 08:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)