Jump to content

Talk:Alma Sundquist/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kingsif (talk · contribs) 16:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
  • Sources all good
  • Infobox good
  • Images good
  • History clear
  • Lead good length, well written, and good overview coverage
  • Early life and education:
    • Is "matriculated from" correct usage?
Changed it to graduated from.  Done SusunW (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Since the subject is Swedish, wouldn't it use the British spelling of 'paediatricians'
I defer such questions to Ipigott, who as a polyglot, works on multiple languages. Perhaps he can weigh in? SusunW (talk) 19:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems to be more or less in British English, so perhaps we should use "paediatricians". But then "endeavors" would have to be changed to "endeavours".--Ipigott (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done SusunW (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I feel Career could be split at 'In March 1919', with the subsection heading of 'International' or similar, to break it up a bit and make it seem easier to read
No problem. Split into 2 sections as you requested  Done SusunW (talk) 20:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Seems light on legacy for someone seemingly so influential
Added a sentence. Rather difficult as the Swedish sources we have do not analyze the career, just give an accounting of it. The few sources in English, are very brief. Perhaps Ian can add a bit more here as well? SusunW (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Overall

[edit]
Thanks for the review Kingsif. Really appreciate your time to do so and to help improve articles. SusunW (talk) 20:22, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll wait on any comments from Ian, but looks good. Kingsif (talk) 00:34, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Kingsif, I think we're done, unless you think something else needs work. SusunW (talk) 16:06, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the review. It was a pleasure to work with you on the article. SusunW (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]