Talk:Allocapnia fumosa

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 July 2018 by reviewer SkyGazer 512 (talk · contribs).

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Range map

The cited source, a website of the US Fish & Wildlife Service, shows the range map for this insect, consisting of the highlighted states of Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia. This map is visible under the "Range Information" tab. On two of the computers from which I've accessed the webpage, the map is immediately visible. On a third computer, it was not. I'm retaining the link because it points to an excellent map on a reputable website; before rejecting the source link, please keep platform dependence in mind.

Source link: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/profile/speciesProfile?sId=9916

Insektivore (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I initially created this article to resolve a dead link found elsewhere on the site because several Allocapnia species have Wikipedia entries already, while this one does not. This proposed new article, though a stub, is more comprehensive than existing stub articles on Allocapnia pygmaea and Allocapnia recta, for example. As for the criterion of notability, any extant species of animal, especially one encountered in daily life, seems inherently notable.

Insektivore (talk) 13:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost completely sure this article would be notable. I think the main reason for rejection previously was due to the lack of sources for verifiability, but now that you've added many more sources, I think I'll accept the article. :)--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 16:05, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]