Talk:Allegory of Marriage
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Allegory of Marriage article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Allegory of Marriage appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 April 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Nice job on the article, keep up the good work.
Onel5969 TT me 11:05, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 14:57, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that although Titian's Allegory of Marriage (pictured) left England in the 17th century, two early replicas, probably done from the original, remain in the Royal Collection? Source: (1) https://collections.louvre.fr/ark:/53355/cl010066480 (2) https://www.rct.uk/collection/402663/the-allegory-of-alfonso-davalos-0. (3) https://www.rct.uk/collection/402910/the-allegory-of-alfonso-davalos
Created by Ficaia (talk). Self-nominated at 12:39, 6 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Allegory of Marriage; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article is long enough and new enough; used on-line translation from French to English for one important source; no sourcing, copyright, or content issues were found. Hook has good sources and meets length and format criterion. QPQ was done. Image is Public Domain so there are no copyright restrictions; rollover tag is good.--Orygun (talk) 21:57, 6 March 2023 (UTC)