Talk:AllNovaScotia

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Nova Scotia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hi there,

I think I have removed any lines that may be construed as promotional.

I found a peer-reviewed journal from Columbia University that confirms the article's contents.

If there are any other deficiencies please note them or make the changes.

I appreciate the help. This is my first, but hopefully not last, Wikipedia contribution.

ThanksWoodbentley (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References/Further reading

I took the liberty of actually checking out the author of the niemanlab reference (Tim Currie's) website . IMO a possible COI, as Mr. Currie has done work for AllNovaScotia at LEAST six times, as well as submitting work to niemanlab. . Please see http://timcurrie.ca/in-the-media

I have also removed the further reading section for now and replaced it with an official website section as the author who wrote the piece is a student of Mr. Currie. Regards, Aloha27 talk 10:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The website says quoted. Are you sure he wasn't just interviewed for six stories? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.205.170 (talk) 18:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well hello again IP user (likely a sock of https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Maui39xdfffft and woodbentley) whose only contributions to Wikipedia have been regarding this article. I'm still debating whether to ask for a better source for reference #1 in the article as it was written by a student of the aforementioned Mr. Currie. Reference #2 was written by a colleague of Mr. Currie at Journailsm school. ~~It would appear that~~ Without King's College connections the article wouldn't be referenced at all. Please see "http://www.ukings.ca/fr/journalism-faculty-contacts" All we need is a "reference" from Kevin Cox (one of ans' first employees) and this little circle would be complete. Regards, Aloha27 talk 20:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are there Wikipedia rules stating that academic articles can't come from individuals who work/studied at the same educational institution? I'm not sure what other school would be studying a journalism-related topic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.74.205 (talk) 10:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well hello there second sock IP user whose only contributions to the project concern this subject. (Just for fun, check out: "https://tools.wmflabs.org/sigma/editorinteract.py?users=24.222.205.171&users=24.138.74.205&users=&startdate=&enddate=&ns=&server=enwiki&allusers=on").

NOW I think you're getting it. These references AFAICS are NOT peer-referenced. They look like school project/papers by students of Mr. Currie which, if you'll go back through the archives on this article's AfD was the problem that I (and others) had in whether or not these were in fact reliable citations. Regards, Aloha27 talk 11:54, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose the article should be deleted if more public sources can't be found. No one wants to improve the stub article. You are spending a lot of time poking holes in it. But why didn't this come up during the deletion discussion? The consensus was that the sources established notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.138.74.205 (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]