Talk:Alissa Bjerkhoel
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
COI
[edit]To repeat what I said at Talk:Alex Simpson (attorney), since this article has the same issues:
The COI tag is related to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#QuisLex (perm). The extreme level of superfluous detail in this article about a relatively minor figure would be a bad sign all by itself. This is made worse byt the passing mentions/press releases/etc. used as sources. This suggest this was written with promotional intent. Since the editor who wrote this has disclosed prior paid editing after-the-fact for one article, but has not clarified any others, this seems like a plausible concern here. These tags should not be removed until these issues have been addressed.
The simplest way to resolve this would be for a neutral editor to verify all sources as reliable, and trim so that content was proportional. Promotional language, such as peacock words, or flattering tangential details, should also be removed. Grayfell (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2019 (UTC)